Summary
AI art generators seem like a lot of fun at first glance.
But once you look past the surface, you’ll see it’s not all fun and games.
Who’s behind the art the AI generator produces?
Who owns the rights to it?
Let’s take a deeper look into the dark side of AI art.
The concept seemed simple enough.
You feed an AI generator images of yourself, and it crafts artful reimaginings of your likeness.
Social media was flooded with people participating in the trend.
TikTok was ablaze, Instagram and X (formerly Twitter), too.
And that’s the crux of itAI generators cannot make something from nothing.
Are the ones behind the AI generator entitled to use the images the generator itself creates?
What about the photos you fed to it?
Do you relinquish your rights to these images when you agree to use the service?
Let’s discuss the potential issues with the AI art trend.
Well, when it comes to AI art generators, you really should take the time to read them.
Prisma Labs is among themost used AI art generators.
Don’t skip reading terms and conditions when dealing with AI art generators.
Know what you’re giving up to receive an amusing image in return; your biometric data.
Copyright
Copyright is a huge issue when it comes to AI-generated art.
That isn’t stopping people from trying to copyright AI-generated art.
It also makes you wonder who deserves the copyright in the first place.
Is the person or entity who created the AI generator the one to hold the copyright to its creations?
Is it the person who fed it their images and carefully selected the “right” compositions from it?
That’s more than one person.
The bottom line is that these generators use other people’s art to learn how to make art.
But that’s not what happens.
The AI generators pull art from everywhere on the internet that it’s freely available to view.
But freely available to view is not the same as freely available to use.
This is why many don’tconsider AI art real art.
Maybe it’s an amalgamation of millions of works by a ton of different artists.
Morality often tends to get disregarded in favor of legality.
But the content these generators learn from is made by humans, and humans are hardly infallible.
So, inevitably, you’re free to end up with AI-generated art that’s offensive and harmful.
The concern is that AI will disrupt that.
On both ends, the AI art generator accesses an array of images.
So, when it creates, who’s the creative mind behind it?
If the AI copies someone’s style outright, it’s theft.
But what if it tweaks a small part that it sees featured in other art?
Is it then considered a creative geniusno.
It’s just a machine that’s learned well.
The question that arises is: Is AI a threat to creativity?
And not only to current artists but to future ones, as well?
No one denies the fun aspect of AI-generated art.
AI art has a dark side, and we can’t pretend it doesn’t exist.
