However, when it comes to antivirus software, the more eyes, the better may not hold true.
While proponents have valid arguments, there are several reasons why antivirus programs dont need to be open source.
Crowdsourced Antivirus Tools Don’t Update Fast Enough
Antivirus programs require constant updatesto stay one step ahead.
Miker Rivero/MakeUseOf/TippaPatt/ShutterstockRawpixel/Shutterstock
Maintaining this relentless pace of vigilance and response through an open-source project presents some hurdles.
Open-source antivirus programs commonly rely on crowdsourced signature databases contributed voluntarily.
As a result, they tend to lag behind paid alternatives in rolling out signature and definition updates.
Expecting an all-volunteer community to deliver fixes and updates regularly and quickly is ambitious.
Additionally, open-source development depends on the unpaid contributions of security experts and engineers.
Remember that, at the end of the day, the product will be given away for free.
However, this transparency presents unique challenges in the context of antivirus software.
As with all software, vulnerabilities inherently existwhether the code is open or closed.
These programs rely partly on obscurity to gain ground over evolving threats.
Were bugs to become widely known through public review, bad actors could more swiftly circumvent protections.
Even after a fix arrives, they may already have workarounds prepared.
Likewise, algorithms and techniques must evolve continuously to counter advancing malware tactics.
Maintaining this swift development cycle within an open model is quite difficult.
Open-source projects often rely on volunteers contributing in their spare time.
Additionally, security research and development demand handsome remuneration.
The nature of antivirus protection aligns well with proprietary models built for relentless, acute response to cyberattacks.
Proprietary antivirus leads the charge with multipronged defenses that go well beyond mere signature matching.
This approach contrasts open-source options like ClamAV.
While handy for basic duties like email scanning, its detection rates and regular signature updates can’t compete.
Open-source antivirus mainly sticks to signature databases without extra tactics like heuristic analysis or behavior blocking.
Besides, effective security solutions do not inherently require publicly visible code.
Open-source proponents argue that widespread independent review strengthens defenses against exploitation, meaning your interests are always protected.
However, adequately testing all open-source software can be a challenge.
Of course, bad actors exist on both sides.
However, proprietary companies understand that endangering users would destroy their business overnight.
While open-source spurs remarkable innovations, antivirus is better off being closed and proprietary.
