Here, we’ll compare both options and help you pick the right wearable for your needs and budget.
This app serves as a central hub for syncing data, tracking fitness goals, and accessing additional features.
However, it integrates seamlessly with Apple’s Health and Fitness apps.
FitbitandApple
It also offers better battery life and comes with dedicated running features.
Consider an Apple Watch if you don’t want your phone to distract you during workouts.
The Apple Watch can’t detect how much weight you lift.
Ground Picture/Shutterstock
However, Apple Watch gains an advantage due to its seamless integration with iPhones.
Adding cellular support incurs an additional $100.
The stainless steel models come at a higher price point, starting at $699.
Tina Sieber and Raghav Sethi/MakeUseOf
For those with budget constraints, Fitbit presents a more favorable option.
However, it’s important to note that Fitbit watches don’t offer cellular connectivity.
However, this model does not feature ECG and Cycle Tracking apps.
Raghav Sethi/MakeUseOf
It’s up to you to decide which fitness tracker you want to spend your hard-earned money on.
Fitbit
