Hosting your code is an integral part of any development project.
A repository hosting service becomes an important choice, as it predominantly affects the productivity of your development team.
Nevertheless, the two most famous code repositories continue to battle it out to emerge as the winner.
Smartmockups
In the GitHub vs BitBucket comparison, which one will prove to be more beneficial?
Why Is a Code Repository Important?
You need a repository to enhance the version control software for your project.
A code repository proves its worth when you want to collaborate with other members of the development team.
BitBucket focuses on private code, and GitHub focuses on public code.
GitHub has a large, open-source community with many individual and small-scale projects.
BitBucket, on the other hand, packs more benefits for enterprise and business users.
This doesn’t mean that you’re free to’t post privately on GitHub or vice versa.
Both platforms give the best outputs when used as intended.
What Is BitBucket?
The version control repository hosting service, BitBucket, was set up in 2008 by Atlassian.
Its written in Python using the Django web framework.
The code repository is known for its flexibility.
The platform features a whopping 100 million repositories and is deemed to be the hub for Git Version Control.
This open-source code repository was started in 2004 and got acquired by Microsoft in 2018.
Some of GitHubs noteworthy features include:
Related:What Is GitHub?
The user interface is relatively distinct, and both repositories offer different default configs.
Let us compare some critical factors that differentiate BitBucket from GitHub.
Both platforms support various extensions and third-party integrations.
On the contrary, BitBucket is way ahead of GitHub in terms of numbers.
The Atlassian Marketplace has more than 2300 applications that support BitBucket and other Atlassian products.
Cross-product compatibility is a handy feature for enterprise developers.
GitHub, on the other hand, comes with the GitHub Marketplace.
User Interface
The user interface becomes an essential factor while choosing any digital platform.
There is no clear winner as selecting a user interface depends on your personal preferences.
The goal is to manage your projects efficiently and navigate easily between different menus.
BitBucket packs a clean and simple-looking UI.
The sidebar navigation with BitBucket is a helpful addition that contains all the essentials.
Navigating through menus is easy, and the learning curve is relatively simple for a first-time user.
GitHub has a very different UI when compared with BitBucket.
The menus are cluttered and can be confusing at times.
The dashboard packs in a lot of options that make it look messy.
They help share knowledge with other members of the community.
Tools like wikis are integrated right into these platforms to help users collaborate seamlessly and share ideas.
BitBucket wikis are created when you make a code repository on the platform.
These wikis are editable and version-controlled.
Many projects even use these wikis as their home pages.
The pricing varies by the number of users and file storage capacity.
You also get 1GB LFS that stores large non-text files.
The enterprise-level BitBucket plans are priced at $1,980 for 25 users.
you’re free to create unlimited public and private repositories on GitHub with no user limit.
You get a 500MB storage space with the free plan.
The GitHub enterprise plans start at $21 per user per month.
GitHub vs BitBucket Comparison
It often becomes tricky to choose the best code repository for your project.
BitBucket and GitHub are both great for specific use cases.
Both platforms support public and private code repositories.
BitBucket offers way more features for enterprise-level projects, while GitHub is well-suited for individual projects.
